Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 19:17:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7983E04CF63654F9E013834661410E46E23FC48EC3AAD9CBA64FBB74353C5499
Participant Details

Original Note:

In 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed there is no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment. Likewise, in 2012, the Supreme Court held that even lies receive First Amendment protection. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-alvarez/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821256072348496258
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7983E04CF63654F9E013834661410E46E23FC48EC3AAD9CBA64FBB74353C5499
  • createdAtMillis - 1723058272474
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212560723484962587983E04CF63654F9E013834661410E46E23FC48EC3AAD9CBA64FBB74353C5499