Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:35:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 478C89D26DBA0E2DE57A1437699A200D05C49CA3817D31332C72F91A6F98C7BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

El TS ha dicho que según su interpretación la malversación no es amnistiable. Por lo tanto, ante 2 interpretaciones posibles, no se puede aplicar una detención y mucho menos una medida cautelar de prisión provisional basándose en una de las interpretaciones posibles. https://dpej.rae.es/lema/fumus-boni-iuris

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821246711118880875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 478C89D26DBA0E2DE57A1437699A200D05C49CA3817D31332C72F91A6F98C7BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723055751846
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821246711118880875478C89D26DBA0E2DE57A1437699A200D05C49CA3817D31332C72F91A6F98C7BA