Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:21:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE39BB89AF132B7F51313505FE1C488DC990E722F8891E35F65F1CD0EA32CBE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed CN completely misses the point that declaring that someone doesn't have a "right" to a fundamental part of existence is in itself enough. E.g. saying that someone lacks a "right to life", is noteworthy, even if not declaring your intent to take it

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821246416108531948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE39BB89AF132B7F51313505FE1C488DC990E722F8891E35F65F1CD0EA32CBE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1723054871540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821246416108531948FE39BB89AF132B7F51313505FE1C488DC990E722F8891E35F65F1CD0EA32CBE0