Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 02:39:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1754B92CD35C6102CA5BA182A3CE31B6599D685D07C7374578F5D9A5473D29F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed CN completely misses the point that declaring that someone doesn't have a "right" to a fundamental part of existence is in itself enough. E.g. saying that someone lacks a "right to life", is noteworthy, even if not declaring your intent to take it

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821246416108531948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1754B92CD35C6102CA5BA182A3CE31B6599D685D07C7374578F5D9A5473D29F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723084787789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212464161085319481754B92CD35C6102CA5BA182A3CE31B6599D685D07C7374578F5D9A5473D29F5