Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:43:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08C0C026E4B8F143949533EBCC9D6B1A11AC29515095E229FD41ACF1F8A28A27
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed CN completely misses the point that declaring that someone doesn't have a "right" to a fundamental part of existence is in itself enough. E.g. saying that someone lacks a "right to life", is noteworthy, even if not declaring your intent to take it

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821246416108531948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08C0C026E4B8F143949533EBCC9D6B1A11AC29515095E229FD41ACF1F8A28A27
  • createdAtMillis - 1723056180880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182124641610853194808C0C026E4B8F143949533EBCC9D6B1A11AC29515095E229FD41ACF1F8A28A27