Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 19:33:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB84DE4F313C9BBBD22820B313E3370A64E69228E3237F845A67696CFD209E10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die in diesem Thread angesprochene Einordnung von Tobias Huch behandelt Lügen von Shurjoka, die vom Landgericht Hamburg von 3 Richterinnen bestätigt worden sind. Es ist Shurjoka untersagt die damals geäußerten Lügen und Diffamierungen erneut zu äußern. https://youtu.be/lTkAVDNcrM4?si=GivYa_k6z_rC4cHR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821241238160294393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB84DE4F313C9BBBD22820B313E3370A64E69228E3237F845A67696CFD209E10
  • createdAtMillis - 1723059228012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821241238160294393FB84DE4F313C9BBBD22820B313E3370A64E69228E3237F845A67696CFD209E10