Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 02:37:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A3EEB7325125D17613682C5EE0F1E3E2B43C7F5A02598296A7ADB32E0653A20
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die in diesem Thread angesprochene Einordnung von Tobias Huch behandelt Lügen von Shurjoka, die vom Landgericht Hamburg von 3 Richterinnen bestätigt worden sind. Es ist Shurjoka untersagt die damals geäußerten Lügen und Diffamierungen erneut zu äußern. https://youtu.be/lTkAVDNcrM4?si=GivYa_k6z_rC4cHR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821241238160294393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A3EEB7325125D17613682C5EE0F1E3E2B43C7F5A02598296A7ADB32E0653A20
  • createdAtMillis - 1723084645948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18212412381602943935A3EEB7325125D17613682C5EE0F1E3E2B43C7F5A02598296A7ADB32E0653A20