Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 21:28:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35344A3477ACE274D11927106971ABC910E0190B697A29E4E1E4698A00CB36F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die in diesem Thread angesprochene Einordnung von Tobias Huch behandelt Lügen von Shurjoka, die vom Landgericht Hamburg von 3 Richterinnen bestätigt worden sind. Es ist Shurjoka untersagt die damals geäußerten Lügen und Diffamierungen erneut zu äußern. https://youtu.be/lTkAVDNcrM4?si=GivYa_k6z_rC4cHR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821241238160294393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35344A3477ACE274D11927106971ABC910E0190B697A29E4E1E4698A00CB36F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723066089868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182124123816029439335344A3477ACE274D11927106971ABC910E0190B697A29E4E1E4698A00CB36F5