Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 17:44:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F452FDD82C531614E41159E015087A3E8312BAD9E361628C41403B07B10301E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The criticism of Walz leaving the Army Reserve comes from a single person who was passed over for a promotion that Walz received. Many other Army soldiers who served with Walz have defended his decision, saying he had talked about retirement to run for congress for a while. https://www.startribune.com/walzs-24-years-in-national-guard-get-renewed-scrutiny-from-gop-opponent-who-didnt-serve/600216280

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821232659655487965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F452FDD82C531614E41159E015087A3E8312BAD9E361628C41403B07B10301E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1723052667084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821232659655487965F452FDD82C531614E41159E015087A3E8312BAD9E361628C41403B07B10301E9