Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 23:42:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E42D83344DB025486F56451745280CBC7CD76A80579956780E650C751F8223D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The criticism of Walz leaving the Army Reserve comes from a single person who was passed over for a promotion that Walz received. Many other Army soldiers who served with Walz have defended his decision, saying he had talked about retirement to run for congress for a while. https://www.startribune.com/walzs-24-years-in-national-guard-get-renewed-scrutiny-from-gop-opponent-who-didnt-serve/600216280

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821232659655487965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E42D83344DB025486F56451745280CBC7CD76A80579956780E650C751F8223D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723074129899
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212326596554879657E42D83344DB025486F56451745280CBC7CD76A80579956780E650C751F8223D