Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 16:32:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E761C32DC5FD30CA1A2824A3247F3F18BF6050B2A130D1FA05339826A6F19934
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The poster is pushing back on the analysis that Walz had broad appeal (e.g. to rural red counties) and presenting factual evidence to support his opinion. If you disagree with his analysis or think it isn't relevant, you can express your disagreement in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821219442266722559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E761C32DC5FD30CA1A2824A3247F3F18BF6050B2A130D1FA05339826A6F19934
  • createdAtMillis - 1723048347421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821219442266722559E761C32DC5FD30CA1A2824A3247F3F18BF6050B2A130D1FA05339826A6F19934