Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:58:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E586462740BF21401D3808A756AB7D95A7714CC690DF0D87B5D1AC2BD498139
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The poster is pushing back on the analysis that Walz had broad appeal (e.g. to rural red counties) and presenting factual evidence to support his opinion. If you disagree with his analysis or think it isn't relevant, you can express your disagreement in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821219442266722559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E586462740BF21401D3808A756AB7D95A7714CC690DF0D87B5D1AC2BD498139
  • createdAtMillis - 1723057107945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212194422667225598E586462740BF21401D3808A756AB7D95A7714CC690DF0D87B5D1AC2BD498139