Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:52:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DF9CE5FD20A9D81D66F4EAEC4C95CC86AE66FF6853D4403B316C7F07A93007C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The poster is pushing back on the analysis that Walz had broad appeal (e.g. to rural red counties) and presenting factual evidence to support his opinion. If you disagree with his analysis or think it isn't relevant, you can express your disagreement in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821219442266722559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6DF9CE5FD20A9D81D66F4EAEC4C95CC86AE66FF6853D4403B316C7F07A93007C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723056768900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212194422667225596DF9CE5FD20A9D81D66F4EAEC4C95CC86AE66FF6853D4403B316C7F07A93007C