Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 22:02:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6259068A9294AA91F8140F4D12CB71A3A3557661E65B5CC5716DD62C5ED0C224
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The poster is pushing back on the analysis that Walz had broad appeal (e.g. to rural red counties) and presenting factual evidence to support his opinion. If you disagree with his analysis or think it isn't relevant, you can express your disagreement in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821219442266722559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6259068A9294AA91F8140F4D12CB71A3A3557661E65B5CC5716DD62C5ED0C224
  • createdAtMillis - 1723068156401
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18212194422667225596259068A9294AA91F8140F4D12CB71A3A3557661E65B5CC5716DD62C5ED0C224