Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 20:35:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes don’t provide evidence that the OP statement is false. Instead, they argue that Walz was demoted. They do not provide evidence that this supposed demotion makes the OP false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821174793640579348
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67
  • createdAtMillis - 1723062950164
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821174793640579348EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67