Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 19:36:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DED87FF5904B38E95FCF6A024494C38F5D5A4F6C063A8F9CEED9C43EAC0B5CC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes don’t provide evidence that the OP statement is false. Instead, they argue that Walz was demoted. They do not provide evidence that this supposed demotion makes the OP false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821174793640579348
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DED87FF5904B38E95FCF6A024494C38F5D5A4F6C063A8F9CEED9C43EAC0B5CC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1723059393930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821174793640579348DED87FF5904B38E95FCF6A024494C38F5D5A4F6C063A8F9CEED9C43EAC0B5CC6