Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:57:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3097DC61A0FE901C414A912BC5A44EC9D2620C4B2B060439C5DC6538616E11D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes don’t provide evidence that the OP statement is false. Instead, they argue that Walz was demoted. They do not provide evidence that this supposed demotion makes the OP false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821174793640579348
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3097DC61A0FE901C414A912BC5A44EC9D2620C4B2B060439C5DC6538616E11D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723057076588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821174793640579348D3097DC61A0FE901C414A912BC5A44EC9D2620C4B2B060439C5DC6538616E11D