Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 01:45:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0BE4AD9257F226BDA4DC72C289B459DA28762A694225B9FA3E4B69675A4632F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes don’t provide evidence that the OP statement is false. Instead, they argue that Walz was demoted. They do not provide evidence that this supposed demotion makes the OP false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821174793640579348
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0BE4AD9257F226BDA4DC72C289B459DA28762A694225B9FA3E4B69675A4632F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723081552823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821174793640579348A0BE4AD9257F226BDA4DC72C289B459DA28762A694225B9FA3E4B69675A4632F