Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:43:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes don’t provide evidence that the OP statement is false. Instead, they argue that Walz was demoted. They do not provide evidence that this supposed demotion makes the OP false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821174793640579348
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1723056193214
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821174793640579348660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8