Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 16:10:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A6B356ACD91A73D64DE6751C1F0B220F66649A8F8E72DF90942562FBCB08189
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim of illegality is based on election law, not terms of service of a website. Dispute this opinion in the replies if you must, but it is an opinion, not a fact you can (dis)prove. https://lawyerscommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/DeceptivePracticesReportJuly2012FINALpdf.pdf https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12180

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1821173647677046996
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 7A6B356ACD91A73D64DE6751C1F0B220F66649A8F8E72DF90942562FBCB08189
createdAtMillis - 1723133416365
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18211736476770469967A6B356ACD91A73D64DE6751C1F0B220F66649A8F8E72DF90942562FBCB08189