Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:12:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B839AEA8D4EC3CCF09EF075CFA6013B2DE8530ECF4F0AB46FD0EBE2BB735465D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Interpretation of the Insurrection Act is divided, and many hold that the President can use it for civil unrest. There were repeated calls and efforts among Trump Administration officials to invoke it; a proclamation to do so was drafted by aides, but not used. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/19/under-insurrection-act-1807-heres-what-us-president-can-cannot-do/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/25/us/politics/trump-insurrection-act-protests.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821173371104850175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B839AEA8D4EC3CCF09EF075CFA6013B2DE8530ECF4F0AB46FD0EBE2BB735465D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723054376135
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821173371104850175B839AEA8D4EC3CCF09EF075CFA6013B2DE8530ECF4F0AB46FD0EBE2BB735465D