Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 18:44:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 496BC46802B04CEC9FF081D61C33C2DD7ECBDEE63944C4F76D5EC3420DFE9947
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Interpretation of the Insurrection Act is divided, and many hold that the President can use it for civil unrest. There were repeated calls and efforts among Trump Administration officials to invoke it; a proclamation to do so was drafted by aides, but not used. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/19/under-insurrection-act-1807-heres-what-us-president-can-cannot-do/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/25/us/politics/trump-insurrection-act-protests.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821173371104850175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 496BC46802B04CEC9FF081D61C33C2DD7ECBDEE63944C4F76D5EC3420DFE9947
  • createdAtMillis - 1723056268645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821173371104850175496BC46802B04CEC9FF081D61C33C2DD7ECBDEE63944C4F76D5EC3420DFE9947