Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 14:03:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The post expresses an opinion. It’s an interpretation of the fact that Walz was chosen. Speculative, yes, but not dishonest. Disagreements are best expressed in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821151635273289787
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136
  • createdAtMillis - 1723039419498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821151635273289787184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136