Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 13:15:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB7B47E9830B3006F156F1CD24AF44A4CB80E136382F7260B8DBE796FA12428A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim that 5G towers are high-frequency beam weapons aimed at specific people. The health impacts of 5G have been well studied, and the consensus among experts is that it doesn't pose significant health risks. https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/is-5g-making-you-sick-probably-not/ https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6 https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_misinformation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821151315218649241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB7B47E9830B3006F156F1CD24AF44A4CB80E136382F7260B8DBE796FA12428A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723036526872
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821151315218649241FB7B47E9830B3006F156F1CD24AF44A4CB80E136382F7260B8DBE796FA12428A