Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 12:41:39 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFADD18435CF950B99EA805B2F0ED96F838BA048207B4D81BAD2C109933B9733
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim that 5G towers are high-frequency beam weapons aimed at specific people. The health impacts of 5G have been well studied, and the consensus among experts is that it doesn't pose significant health risks. https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/is-5g-making-you-sick-probably-not/ https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6 https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_misinformation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821151315218649241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFADD18435CF950B99EA805B2F0ED96F838BA048207B4D81BAD2C109933B9733
  • createdAtMillis - 1723034499329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821151315218649241CFADD18435CF950B99EA805B2F0ED96F838BA048207B4D81BAD2C109933B9733