Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 14:23:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90DB677206F9042D5EF428D68C507A38548D8C27D78A286FE9923EB44BD0C779
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note willfully misunderstands and oversimplifies what we think of as "biological sex." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/beyond-xx-and-xy-the-extraordinary-complexity-of-sex-determination/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821136040863977683
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90DB677206F9042D5EF428D68C507A38548D8C27D78A286FE9923EB44BD0C779
  • createdAtMillis - 1723126995873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182113604086397768390DB677206F9042D5EF428D68C507A38548D8C27D78A286FE9923EB44BD0C779