Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 12:19:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D24F607CEB1D4A2823550324CD99AC309E90D4E55939397E3C61FEBB257B936
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Tuit no engañoso, opiniones de la noticia pueden ir en respuestas. Las notas obvian que la oferta de Eulen era según los baremos la más cara posible, es práctica habitual presentar dos ofertas de relleno que no saldrán. Y la hermana, como directiva, obtiene beneficio directo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821133255908708534
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D24F607CEB1D4A2823550324CD99AC309E90D4E55939397E3C61FEBB257B936
  • createdAtMillis - 1723033188456
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18211332559087085345D24F607CEB1D4A2823550324CD99AC309E90D4E55939397E3C61FEBB257B936