Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 10:24:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 442EBFE0DC4A83FE07EE8E40DE4F5CAC49AA726A4533803C038468350E26E050
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1821063174680146351 は、「現時点の」福島県産の農作物に対する指摘であり、事故発生直後の農作物について言及している本投稿に対するコミュニティノートとしては明らかに不適切です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821118473902363097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 442EBFE0DC4A83FE07EE8E40DE4F5CAC49AA726A4533803C038468350E26E050
  • createdAtMillis - 1723026288639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821118473902363097442EBFE0DC4A83FE07EE8E40DE4F5CAC49AA726A4533803C038468350E26E050