Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 02:41:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3D6B0001CCA72D46798010166CF07A681212DC34326097E655C8D527521DC2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

県境の有無によって、放射性物質に違いが出るということはありません。よって「むしろ近隣県に比べて低いまである」という言説はかえって風評被害を招きかねないことにも留意が必要です。 なお、都道府県などが行っている検査結果は以下でまとめて閲覧できます。 https://www.maff.go.jp/j/kanbo/joho/saigai/s_chosa/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820985561597014272
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3D6B0001CCA72D46798010166CF07A681212DC34326097E655C8D527521DC2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1722998492427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820985561597014272C3D6B0001CCA72D46798010166CF07A681212DC34326097E655C8D527521DC2E