Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 04:08:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58749412AE27BE7B032423B35FFDC359BB01C5B490778EC426069F3CCBBE00C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

県境の有無によって、放射性物質に違いが出るということはありません。よって「むしろ近隣県に比べて低いまである」という言説はかえって風評被害を招きかねないことにも留意が必要です。 なお、都道府県などが行っている検査結果は以下でまとめて閲覧できます。 https://www.maff.go.jp/j/kanbo/joho/saigai/s_chosa/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820985561597014272
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58749412AE27BE7B032423B35FFDC359BB01C5B490778EC426069F3CCBBE00C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1723003690451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182098556159701427258749412AE27BE7B032423B35FFDC359BB01C5B490778EC426069F3CCBBE00C3