Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 21:45:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE3F21F8CFD13EC105E80130C4B1A5C7BFD0536291B89E20970C3D92D4ADE115
Participant Details

Original Note:

What amounts to the top of the Democratic party is a matter of opinion. Arguments about who is or is not considered the top, or what the history of nominations have been and whether that should be taken into account belong in the replies, not the CN. https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820931490714206519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE3F21F8CFD13EC105E80130C4B1A5C7BFD0536291B89E20970C3D92D4ADE115
  • createdAtMillis - 1722980706735
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820931490714206519FE3F21F8CFD13EC105E80130C4B1A5C7BFD0536291B89E20970C3D92D4ADE115