Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 20:39:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

What amounts to the top of the Democratic party is a matter of opinion. Arguments about who is or is not considered the top, or what the history of nominations have been and whether that should be taken into account belong in the replies, not the CN. https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820931490714206519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723149567643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820931490714206519FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC