Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 06:19:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CECDD8FBEEE67334C7284D3615E6A4D703C14E36AB3BD8A3E048D623BA511E3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just because a claim lacks evidence doesn't mean it's misleading. Readers can already see for themselves whether the post contains evidence or not. You don't get to CN every unproven claim on X. Until you can add context or contrary evidence, the claim is the evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820912405251248265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CECDD8FBEEE67334C7284D3615E6A4D703C14E36AB3BD8A3E048D623BA511E3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723011588797
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820912405251248265CECDD8FBEEE67334C7284D3615E6A4D703C14E36AB3BD8A3E048D623BA511E3F