Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 02:37:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9572E1B54689C0829E2D54BDFFF55DB56C91C36AC18C31002638394D1AC7D468
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just because a claim lacks evidence doesn't mean it's misleading. Readers can already see for themselves whether the post contains evidence or not. You don't get to CN every unproven claim on X. Until you can add context or contrary evidence, the claim is the evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820912405251248265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9572E1B54689C0829E2D54BDFFF55DB56C91C36AC18C31002638394D1AC7D468
  • createdAtMillis - 1722998276353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18209124052512482659572E1B54689C0829E2D54BDFFF55DB56C91C36AC18C31002638394D1AC7D468