Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 15:35:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51145F7DE3FCD36D3A769F2B1FE503B67423ED892C60E4E60776545ECBAFD466
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just because a claim lacks evidence doesn't mean it's misleading. Readers can already see for themselves whether the post contains evidence or not. You don't get to CN every unproven claim on X. Until you can add context or contrary evidence, the claim is the evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820912405251248265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51145F7DE3FCD36D3A769F2B1FE503B67423ED892C60E4E60776545ECBAFD466
  • createdAtMillis - 1723044909983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182091240525124826551145F7DE3FCD36D3A769F2B1FE503B67423ED892C60E4E60776545ECBAFD466