Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 16:24:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CB7C81348E372E2B3D1513512391B8E94B1C1E13D87DFF21424DCFF7B879FB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Just because a claim lacks evidence doesn't mean it's misleading. Readers can already see for themselves whether the post contains evidence or not. You don't get to CN every unproven claim on X. Until you can add context or contrary evidence, the claim is the evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820912405251248265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CB7C81348E372E2B3D1513512391B8E94B1C1E13D87DFF21424DCFF7B879FB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723220643165
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18209124052512482650CB7C81348E372E2B3D1513512391B8E94B1C1E13D87DFF21424DCFF7B879FB4