Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 15:43:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E798CA51CB1A9C4AC6E589CE9E0695F781FDF4861DACC8950201622A58B841C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post implies illegal collusion, and makes no claims that companies are required to pay for advertising. CN cites superfluous legislation as strawman. Neither CN nor legislation have anything to do with OP, nor provide the basis for a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820903406799651299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E798CA51CB1A9C4AC6E589CE9E0695F781FDF4861DACC8950201622A58B841C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723045391720
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18209034067996512993E798CA51CB1A9C4AC6E589CE9E0695F781FDF4861DACC8950201622A58B841C