Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 17:50:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post implies illegal collusion, and makes no claims that companies are required to pay for advertising. CN cites superfluous legislation as strawman. Neither CN nor legislation have anything to do with OP, nor provide the basis for a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820903406799651299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723053002800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18209034067996512990EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC