Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 21:00:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F0265548B1595D1876EEED81AD5D71156B00A1B7EEC718BC474E24836D3552C3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details