Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-07 00:37:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C7D2850F2B5E09F215B2B9A5D88BE7CAA9B578A0775B5A04BD4BE6B0B1C0B862
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details