Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 23:31:16 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B9CF5B1921DA91AFB2D68B8EB3BB97EC6C6DA7DA3ABBD6E0B657CE2D2F4D05CD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details