Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-07 07:30:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B05A9E3681A047A07B0411C2603B983C2A8B8E6791DA55C3116A9FC047A591CD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details