Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 20:10:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A429DA64F09B1AA46E9A06F04162B625DE9AF0F7D96B6AD2CB8EAE6F6B8F1B08
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details