Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 20:15:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 85E3B0A252C2AA155508E14140E2CA13329C39A18F1B5B0F3D11D28A882A517B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details