Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 20:05:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 694F47C61E37CA2BEE46E51B61B96287DDCADABE52C4CCF935B1D884587C7FDF
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details