Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 23:34:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 606573D57A0BDCAB0AE8864609F69DA4E10E838ABCE9821A17F066EB9C456B3E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details