Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 22:55:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 449379F61BC5AB99BEE3FB3C92816D5B24E1F0803E639DBE61C5EAD739BFDC98
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details