Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 19:11:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0F0397EA6619F59F64A6BFC80CA546017C4B13DC7CF554E522F14179FB8E99B7
Participant Details
Original Note:
Note needed by technicality. While the US House Judiciary Committee did find 'potentially illegal' bias towards Twitter/X, it should not be called illegal until proven in a court of law; the World Federation of Advertisers' actions may be protected under the 1st amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/house-judiciary-committee-report-exposes-shadowy-corporate-coordination-silence https://www.techpolicy.press/the-first-amendment-protects-advertisers-too/
All Note Details