Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 17:28:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet says that Walz "wore the rank" which he did. Technicalities about retiring prior to being fully confirmed can be litigated in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820862450431865187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E
  • createdAtMillis - 1722965302647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820862450431865187DD69C586132C9EB457F3DF214972045587440DCBAEE17C84E366C923172C429E