Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 02:10:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet says that Walz "wore the rank" which he did. Technicalities about retiring prior to being fully confirmed can be litigated in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820862450431865187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722996628854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18208624504318651873E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0